https://w3id.org/np/RAUh0V0yhl... RAUh0V0yhl

links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion

http://purl.org/dc/terms/creator creator

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1267-0234 Tobias Kuhn

Tobias Kuhn

2023-12-06T08:17:19.428Z

https://w3id.org/np/RAUh0V0yhl... RAUh0V0yhl

links a nanopublication to its provenance http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasProvenance provenance

http://www.w3.org/ns/prov#wasAttributedTo wasAttributedTo

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1267-0234 Tobias Kuhn

Tobias Kuhn

2023-12-06T08:17:19.428Z

https://w3id.org/np/RAUh0V0yhl... RAUh0V0yhl

links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion

http://purl.org/spar/cito/reviews reviews

https://w3id.org/np/RAagramW3z... RAagramW3z

Tobias Kuhn

2023-12-06T08:17:19.428Z

https://w3id.org/np/RAUh0V0yhl... RAUh0V0yhl

links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion

http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment comment

On top of my previous message about the choice of the subclass, it could be considered to make it an instance of such a class instead of a subclass. Is the term "Unstable Population Indicator" supposed to stand for a whole set of individual things (then it should be a class) or just a single (conceptual) entity (then it should be an instance as a member of a class like "Indicator").

Tobias Kuhn

2023-12-06T08:17:19.428Z