References for: comment

Full identifier: http://purl.org/np/RACefo-6H6Mu2grt1xMgw-_23yzqCmZXhE4cycALDXrHg#comment

Nanopublication Part Subject Predicate Object Published By Published On
links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion
comment
Mariya Dimitrova
2021-08-17T10:35:45.055Z
links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion
comment
Mariya Dimitrova
2021-08-17T10:35:45.055Z
links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion
comment
Mariya Dimitrova
2021-08-17T10:35:45.055Z
links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion
comment
Mariya Dimitrova
2021-08-17T10:35:45.055Z
links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion
comment
Mariya Dimitrova
2021-08-17T10:35:45.055Z
links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion
comment
2
Mariya Dimitrova
2021-08-17T10:35:45.055Z
links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion
comment
This formalisation paper captures excellently one of the main claims made in the original article. I have a small comment regarding the style of the formalisation paper itself. There is no quote from the original paper and instead the paraphrased claim was inserted (sub:quote triple in the Provenance section).
Mariya Dimitrova
2021-08-17T10:35:45.055Z
links a nanopublication to its assertion http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasAssertion assertion
comment
Mariya Dimitrova
2021-08-17T10:35:45.055Z