assertion

Full identifier: https://w3id.org/fair/icc/np/I3-Explanation/RAQqA84T6twSJSK0q4TNO4vVbLLnpEEYTiUZIFE3sMVjE#assertion

Minted in Nanopublication

 RAQqA84T6t comment approve/disapprove edit as derived nanopublication

https://w3id.org/fair/icc/terms/I3-Explanation I3-Explanation http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#comment comment (this is a literal) "An important aspect of FAIR is that data or metadata, generally speaking, does not exist in a silo - we must do what is necessary to ensure that the knowledge representing a resource is connected to that of other resources to create a meaningfully interlinked network of data and services. A “qualified reference” is a reference to another resource (i.e., referencing that external resource’s persistent identifier), in which the nature of the relationship is also clearly specified. For instance, when multiple versions of a metadata file are available, it may be useful to provide links to prior or next versions using a named relation such as “prior version” or “next version” (preferably using an appropriate community standard relationship that itself conforms to the FAIR principles). In the case of data, imagine a dataset that specifies the population of cities around the world. To be FAIR with respect to principle I3, the data could contain links to a resource containing city data (e.g. Wikidata: http://wikidata.org/, doi:10.1145/2187980.2188242), geographical and geospatial data, or other related domain resources that are generated by that city, so long as they are properly qualified references using meaningful, clearly-interpretable relationships. It is also important to note that many different metadata files (containers) being FAIR digital resources in themselves, can be pointing to the same ‘target’ object (a data set or a workflow for instance). We can for instance have intrinsic metadata (‘what is this’) and how was it created (provenance type metadata) as well as ‘secondary’ metadata that are for instance created (separately and later in time) by reusers of a particular digital resource. These could all be metadata containers essentially describing the same digital resource from different perspectives. This principle therefore also relates to the good practice to clearly distinguish between metadata (files/containers) and the resources they describe." .
https://w3id.org/fair/icc/terms/I3-Explanation I3-Explanation https://w3id.org/fair/icc/terms/implementation-examples implementation-examples (this is a literal) "It is worth noting as an example that several “upper ontologies” such as the SemanticScience Integrated Ontology (https://bioportal.bioontology.org/ontologies/SIO) have a wide range of precisely-defined relationships that can be used as-is, or as a starting-point for a newly-minted relationship that is more specific than the one provided in the upper-ontology. The benefit of “inheriting” from higher-level relationships is that agents capable of understanding these higher level concepts, can infer at least a basic interpretation of the intent of the new relationship coined within the community, and therefore enhances interoperability." .
This is the identifier for this whole nanopublication. https://w3id.org/fair/icc/np/I3-Explanation/RAQqA84T6t... This nanopublication date and time when the nanopublication was created http://purl.org/dc/terms/created was created on (this is a literal) "2019-11-22T18:41:24.945+01:00" .
This is a local identifier minted within the nanopublication. https://w3id.org/fair/icc/np/I3-Explanation/RAQqA84T6t...#sig sig http://purl.org/nanopub/x/hasAlgorithm has the algorithm (this is a literal) "RSA" .

Tobias Kuhn, 22 Nov 2019, 17:41:24 UTC

References

Nanopublication Part Subject Predicate Object Published By Published On
links a nanopublication to its provenance http://www.nanopub.org/nschema#hasProvenance provenance
assertion
Tobias Kuhn
2019-11-22T17:41:24.945Z

Raw

TriG(txt), JSON-LD(txt), N-Quads(txt), XML(txt)